Evidence & Sources Policy

Why Evidence Matters

Health technology influences important decisions about health, wellness and healthcare. Readers deserve information that goes beyond marketing claims and is supported by credible evidence whenever possible.

Our editorial process prioritises transparency about the quality and limitations of the evidence available for every product we review.

Types of Sources We Use

Depending on the topic, we may consult one or more of the following sources:

• Peer-reviewed scientific journals
• Clinical practice guidelines
• Government health agencies
• Medical device regulatory authorities
• Official manufacturer documentation
• Product user manuals
• Published technical specifications
• Independent testing organisations
• Professional medical organisations
• Official software documentation

Our Evidence Hierarchy

Not all evidence carries the same weight. When evaluating health-related claims, we generally prioritise sources in the following order:

Manufacturer Information

Manufacturer documentation is useful for understanding product specifications and intended features.

However, manufacturer claims are not automatically accepted as evidence of real-world performance. Where possible, we compare those claims with independent information and clearly distinguish promotional statements from verified facts.

Scientific Evidence

When discussing scientific studies, we aim to present findings accurately and within their proper context.

• We avoid overstating conclusions.
• We acknowledge limitations of available research.
• We explain when evidence is limited or evolving.
• We distinguish between preliminary findings and established evidence.

Keeping Content Up to Date

Technology and healthcare evolve continuously.

Articles may be updated to reflect:

• Software updates
• New product releases
• Changes in clinical guidance
• Updated regulatory information
• New scientific evidence
• Important product recalls or safety notices

Referencing Our Sources

Whenever practical, articles include references, citations or links to primary sources that help readers understand where important information originated.

We encourage readers to consult original sources when making significant healthcare decisions.

What We Avoid

• Unverified rumours
• Anonymous claims presented as fact
• Misleading marketing language
• Cherry-picked evidence
• Unsupported medical claims
• Clickbait headlines that misrepresent research

Questions About Our Sources?

If you have questions about the evidence supporting one of our articles or would like to suggest additional sources, we welcome your feedback through our Contact page.